尽管政治格局仍在快速变动，但可以清楚看到，美国总统特朗普与以色列总理内塔尼亚胡共同发动对伊朗战争中，多次被证明对伊朗“投降”的判断失误，如今正寻求一条退场之路。
特朗普寻找的并非任何形式的退场，而是一种能向美国人民与全世界宣称为“全面胜利”以及为伊朗与中东带来“史上最佳协议”的退场方式。
因此，最近特朗普在白宫办公室向记者谈及与伊朗政府结束战争的谈判时，当被问到为何战争持续时间超过四至六周，特朗普回应说，他“休战了一下”，并且“想要达成最好的协议”。
“我也稍微停战了一下。我给了他们一个喘息的机会。记住这一点：我想要达成最好的协议。”
穿著“让美国再次伟大”礼服对伊战阅兵
为何特朗普如此强调要达成“最佳协议”，让人不禁联想到《皇帝的新衣》的隐喻。这个寓言提供了一个最适合分析当前美伊冲突形象政治的视角。在这种观察下，“新衣”就是向国内民众宣传的“历史性胜利”与“最佳协议”，而冲突背后的现实，却依然充满战略上的复杂与困境。
这一比喻可从三个主要面向来展开。
一、“全面胜利”的宣告
正如皇帝游行展示并不存在的华服一样，美国政府的论述高度集中于削弱伊朗能力——特别是声称在“史诗怒火行动”中摧毁伊朗领导层、海军，以及导弹制造设施。
当皇帝昂首阔步宣称全面胜利时，他向目瞪口呆的“让美国再次伟大”阅兵群众提醒，他有能力让伊朗回到“石器时代”，并警告说，一个拥有世界最古老文明之一的国家，可能“今晚就会消亡”，而且“永远无法复原”。
表象：对支持性的媒体与国内基本盘而言，这是一场“短暂、决定性”的战争，特朗普完成了历届政府未能做到的事情。
现实：尽管军事打击规模庞大，并对伊朗的军事与公共基础设施造成重大破坏，但一个稳定、战后的中东秩序这件“衣服”，对观察者而言仍然是看不见的。霍尔木兹海峡的封锁以及能源价格上涨，不仅让部分参与阅兵的人感到不安，也使得参与人数比以往更少。这也表明，在局势远未平息的情况下，无论以何种“胜利者”的姿态来重新组织一场游行，可能都是适得其反的。
二、“最佳协议”的叙事
特朗普转向寻求一项“最佳协议”以退出战争，被其幕僚与热情支持者描绘成一场高明的战术转折。
宣传：美国国内观众被告知，美国正以绝对优势的位置进行谈判，因为已经“中和”了对手。美国战争部长在阅兵开始时带领祈祷，警告有必要“以最残酷的方式摧毁敌人”，并提醒阅兵群众：“我们是用炸弹来谈判。”
摩擦：实际上，这项“协议”正由巴基斯坦与阿曼等第三方在日益加深的僵局中斡旋。这些低调而近乎绝望的秘密谈判，与“让美国再次伟大”阅兵中高声宣扬的胜利论调形成鲜明对比，也凸显出皇帝对那些他在言辞中忽视或鲜少给予肯定的中介者依赖。
皇帝的宫廷（即支持性媒体）不断强化这样的观念：任何停火都是伊朗的战略让步；而批评者则认为，美国政府正在寻找一条从一场比原先承诺更昂贵、更具外交成本的冲突中撤退的出路。
三、“织布者”的角色（媒体与话语）
在《皇帝的新衣》寓言中，织布者说服皇帝：只有“不称职”或“愚蠢”的人才看不见那件衣服。
回声：在当前政治氛围中，伊朗冲突的叙事逐渐呈现出“不是支持我们，就是反对我们”的语气。质疑这场战役的成功或退出策略的可行性，往往被支持政府的媒体描述为“软弱”或“党派偏见”。
“难道你瞎了，看不见他身上那件令人惊叹的‘让美国再次伟大’／伊朗长袍的布料与缝线吗？”——某最受欢迎的媒体网络在直播阅兵时如此发问。
与此同时，最狂热的阅兵支持者甚至呼吁进一步发动更多“外科手术式打击”，包括攻击被视为“附带必要损害”的民用基础设施，以维持那件新衣的幻象。
观众：持续的宣传与政治话语形成一个回馈循环，使美国国内基本盘看到的是一场力量展示的阅兵，即便国际盟友选择不参与这场游行。
总结： 将《皇帝的新衣》比喻应用于当前局势
寓言元素─当前地缘政治情境
新衣─“任务完成”与“完美协议”的宣称
游行─电视演说与快速反应的社交媒体宣传
看不见的现实─霍尔木兹海峡封锁与地区不稳定带来的后勤与经济困境
当“让美国再次伟大”战略家与“织布者”继续赞扬他们的国王与皇帝的“天才”与其《交易的艺术》必然成功策略时，当务之急，是让更多“孩子的声音”出现，揭露这场冲突及其统治所带来的赤裸现实，以及沉重的人道与社会经济代价。
那些没有参与这场阅兵的非政府组织、智库与独立媒体，即使稍慢，也应该勇于发出不同的声音与警示。
●本文借鉴丹麦作家安徒生于1837年发表的著名童话《皇帝的新衣》。
林德宜《特朗普身披华服对伊战阅兵》原文：President Trump Wears Finery In Iran War Parade
Article drawing on Hans Christian Anderson Famous Children Story, The Emperor’s New Clothes, published in 1837
Although the political landscape continues to shift rapidly, it is clear that President Donald Trump, facing what he has repeatedly been proven wrong about Iran’s “surrender” in the war that he, together with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched, is looking for an exit.
Not just any form of exit but one that he can trumpet to Americans and the world as “a total victory” and the “best ever deal” for the Iranians and the Middle East.
Thus, most recently while speaking with reporters in the Oval Office about the negotiations with the Iranian government to end it, when asked why the war has been going on for longer than four to six weeks, Trump responded by saying "he took a break" and "wants the best deal".
"I also took a little break. I gave them a break and remember this: I want to make the best deal."
Wearing The MAGA Gown In Iran War Parade
Why Trump is looking for the best deal conjures the metaphor of "The Emperor’s New Clothes". This provides the best lens through which to analyze the current optics of the US-Iran conflict. In this viewing, the "new clothes" are the proclamations of a "historic victory" and a "best deal" being sold to the domestic public, while the underlying reality of the conflict remains fraught with strategic complications.
The elaboration of this analogy can be broken down into three primary dimensions.
1. The Proclamation of "Total Victory"
Just as the Emperor paraded to show off non-existent finery, the administration’s rhetoric focuses heavily on the degradation of Iranian capabilities - specifically the destruction of their leadership, navy and the dismantling of missile manufacturing sites during Operation Epic Fury.
As the Emperor struts around proclaiming total victory, he reminds the awestruck MAGA parade crowd of his ability to bring Iran back to the “stone age” and warns that an entire civilization—one of the oldest in the world - could "die tonight" and "never be brought back again".
The Optics: To the supportive media and the domestic base, the narrative is one of a "short, decisive war" that achieved what previous administrations could not.
The Reality: While military strikes have been extensive and devastated Iran’s military and public infrastructure, the "clothes" of a stable, post-conflict Middle East are invisible to observers. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the resulting higher energy prices has not only unsettled some participants in the parade and resulted in a smaller crowd than usual. It also suggests that it may be counter productive to organise another parade in a situation that is far from settled, regardless of the triumphalist framing.
2. The Narrative of the "Best Deal"
The administration’s shift toward a "best deal" to exit the war is being framed as a masterful tactical pivot by his courtiers and breathless admirers from his country's learned class.
The Spin: The domestic audience is told that the US is negotiating from a position of absolute strength, having "neutralized" the adversary. His War Minister, leading the prayers at the beginning of the parade, warns of the need “to destroy the enemy as viciously as possible” and reminds the parade crowd that “we negotiate with bombs”.
The Friction: In reality, the "deal" is being mediated by third parties like Pakistan and Oman amidst a deepening impasse. The quiet, desperate nature of these back-channel negotiations, contrasting with the loud, triumphalist rhetoric at the MAGA parade, highlights the Emperor's reliance on the intermediaries that his rhetoric overlooks or gives little credit to.
The Emperor’s court (the supportive media) reinforces the idea that any ceasefire is a strategic concession by Iran, while critics argue the administration is searching for an off-ramp from a conflict that has become more economically and diplomatically expensive than initially promised.
3. The Role of the "Weaver" (Media and Rhetoric)
In the original fable, the weavers convinced the Emperor that only the "unfit" or "stupid" could not see the clothes.
The Echo: In the current political climate, the framing of the Iran conflict has adopted a "with us or against us" tone. Questioning the success of the campaign or the feasibility of the exit strategy is often characterized by supportive outlets as "weakness" or "partisan bias”.
“Are you so blind that you cannot see the incredible fabric and stitching in the MAGA/Iranian gown that he is wearing”, the most popular media network asks when covering the parade live!
Meanwhile the most enthusiastic paraders are calling for even more "surgical strikes", including on civilian infrastructure deemed as "collateral necessity" to help maintain the illusion of the new clothes.
The Audience: Continuing work and rhetoric creates a feedback loop where the domestic base sees a parade of strength, even as international allies decline to join the parade.
Summary Table: Applying the New Clothes Analogy
Element of the Fable ─Current Geopolitical Context
The New Clothes ─The claim of "mission accomplished" and a "perfect deal."
The Parade ─Televised addresses and "Rapid Response" social media campaigns.
The Invisible Reality─ The logistical nightmare of a closed Strait of Hormuz and regional instability
As the MAGA strategists and weavers continue to laud the ‘genius’ of their king and Emperor and his “Art of the Deal” brilliant strategy of inevitable success, there is an urgent need for more children' s voices to emerge and expose the nakedness and the human and socio-economic costs of the conflict and his reign.
NGOs, think tanks, and independent media staying out from the parade should lend their dissident voices and concerns even if a little late.
本文观点，不代表《东方日报》立场。
要看最快最熱資訊，請來Follow我們 《東方日報》WhatsApp Channel.
