本届世界杯很可能将以另一种方式载入足球史册——美国总统替自己的国家踢进了一记“乌龙球”。
体育赛事之所以令人难忘，不只是因为冠军与败军、球员与球队的表现，更因为公平竞赛或犯规争议、体育精神的展现与否，以及场内外那些足以改变历史的事件。
2026年国际足联世界杯期间，一宗迅速登上全球头条、引发巨大争议的事件，便是美国总统亲自介入美国前锋弗拉林·巴洛根（Folarin Balogun）的停赛风波。在美国对波黑的比赛中，巴洛根因领到红牌遭停赛一场。然而，特朗普却以前所未有的方式，向国际足联主席因凡蒂诺施压，要求重新检讨停赛决定。
随后，国际足联援引《纪律守则》第27条，将原本的一场停赛改为一年缓刑执行，实际上让巴洛根得以出战16强对比利时的淘汰赛。
全球媒体与体育机构的反应
这项决定立即引发全球哗然。许多国际观察人士认为，此举已严重损害国际足联作为全球足球管理机构的独立性。欧洲足联更指责国际足联“跨越了红线”。欧洲足联在声明中表示，当规则的守护者都无法确保规则被一致执行时，足球运动的公信力便受到威胁。
比利时方面的反应：比利时足球总会对此表示“震惊”，并批评这项决定“直接违背世界杯竞赛规则”。该总会尝试提出正式上诉，但遭国际足联以“不予受理”为由驳回。
政治介入体育的疑虑
全球媒体及多位体育评论人士均将此事件视为“将体育武器化、服务政治目的”的典型案例，并指出政治领袖不应左右独立体育机构的裁决。
国际评论普遍形容，这是一场前所未有的“政治风暴”。虽然少数美国支持者对此表示欢迎，但更多人认为，这次政治干预已从根本上削弱了国际足联的公信力。更糟糕的是，美国原本希望借由主办世界杯提升国家软实力，如今却因被贴上偏袒、霸凌与滥用政治影响力的标签，反而重创自身形象。
美国软实力衰退
过去十年，美国软实力持续明显下滑。虽然美国仍是全球文化、科技及创新的重要中心，但其透过吸引力、价值观与制度领导国际社会的能力，却因政治极化、外交政策转向及全球秩序变迁而大幅削弱。
许多观察人士认为，特朗普这次前所未见、却又极具“特朗普式霸凌风格”的行为，很可能成为美国软实力遭受最沉重打击的一次，尤其世界杯拥有数十亿全球观众。甚至不少向来支持美国的人，在此事件上也选择沉默，甚至避而不谈。
全球对美国观感（2016—2026）
近年的民调早已反映，美国国际形象持续恶化。
好感度持续下降：根据美国民调公司盖洛普调查，自2021年以来，全球对美国持正面看法的比例大多低于50%。截至2026年，约只有40%的全球受访者对美国抱持好感，而59%则持负面评价。
“可信赖”形象下滑：皮尤研究中心近年的调查也显示，许多国家的多数民众已不再相信，美国有助于维护全球和平与稳定，也不认为美国会充分考虑其他国家的利益。
全球软实力排名：品牌估值谘询机构Brand Finance于2026年1月公布的《全球软实力指数》显示，在193个国家中，美国是跌幅最大的国家。虽然由于历史影响力、文化输出及科技优势，美国仍受到不少人支持，但其在政府治理、人权、法治等核心声誉指标均出现明显下滑。
美国软实力下滑的主要原因
美国软实力持续下滑，普遍被认为是内部治理失灵与外交政策重大转变共同造成的结果。
1.“美国优先”外交政策：
多边合作退场：美国逐步远离联合国、世界贸易组织等多边制度，使国际社会越来越难将其视为值得信赖、遵守国际规则的领导者。
交易式外交：外交政策日益偏向交易与施压，而非透过价值、制度及长期盟友关系建立影响力，因此削弱了美国软实力。
2.国内政治极化：
民主制度受质疑：全球民调显示，国际社会愈来愈怀疑美式民主制度的运作。当美国政治制度被视为高度分裂与不稳定时，美国作为民主典范的吸引力自然下降。
制度信任流失：国内政治动荡及频繁对外干预，使外界认为美国难以提供稳定且可信赖的全球领导。
3.中国的多元战略布局：
中国近年来积极改善自身的国际形象与认知弱点，著力推动经济扩张、科技创新及文化交流，全面提升其全球影响力。根据《2026年全球软实力指数》，中国首次在“声誉”指标上超越美国，逐渐成为许多对西方主导的国际秩序及其法治诠释感到被边缘化国家的可信替代选择。
4.文化与科技的持续优势：
尽管美国在政治与外交层面的软实力有所衰退，但其凭借文化霸权，以及在艺术、娱乐、影视和媒体等领域的长期主导地位，仍然保有强大的全球吸引力。美国在欧洲和亚洲仍拥有一批坚定支持者。其中部分支持者包括保守派、极端主义者及法西斯倾向人士。他们对美国的成就抱持近乎盲目的崇拜，并将美国视为拯救世界、尤其是对抗中国的重要力量。
此外，矽谷在科技创新、科学研究及互联网领域的领导地位，依然是美国最重要的优势之一。这种持续的科技竞争力，确保美国在全球议程设定与创新发展中，仍然居于核心地位。
结论
毫无疑问，美国软实力正快速衰退。这种观感，再加上美国近年在委内瑞拉及伊朗等地积极运用军事与强制力量，使外界愈来愈认为，一个国家的全球影响力，未来将更取决于其公信力、国际规范与价值认同，而非军事力量、经济制裁或战争能力。
真正的教训在于，当一个国家过度依赖硬实力——包括军事力量、经济制裁及单边“让美国再次伟大”政策，便会陷入一种吊诡：那些原本用来达成短期战略目标的工具，同时也在摧毁软实力最重要的基础，即吸引力。
在资讯高度分散、社交媒体主导全球舆论的新时代，美国早已不再垄断全球叙事权。全球对特朗普试图干预世界杯赛事的强烈反弹，也反映出一个事实：在软实力的竞争场域中，昔日的世界霸权，如今已无法逃避全球舆论的审视与批判。
林德宜《世界杯：美国踢进自己的乌龙球》原文：Football World Cup: America's Own Goal
What is likely to become an important part of football history annals is the own goal of the U.S. president against his own country.
Sporting events are remembered not only for the winners, losers and individual and team performance but also for the fair or foul play, sporting integrity or lack of it, and memorable incidents on and off the field.
One incident that emerged to become headline news and a focal point of controversy in the 2026 FIFA World Cup tournament was the personal intervention by the American president following the match ban on U.S. striker Folarin Balogun. Following Balogun’s red card in the U.S. match against Bosnia and Herzegovina, in an unprecedented move, Trump pressured FIFA President Gianni Infantino for a review of the suspension.
FIFA subsequently invoked Article 27 of its disciplinary code to suspend the one-match ban for a one-year probationary period, effectively clearing Balogun to play in the round of 16 match against Belgium.
Global Media and Institutional Reaction
The decision triggered an immediate and widespread outcry, with many international observers arguing that it compromised the independence of football's governing body. UEFA, Europe’s governing body, accused FIFA of "crossing a red line." In a statement, UEFA warned that when the certainty of rules is no longer guaranteed by their guardians, the integrity of the game is at stake.
The Belgian Perspective: The Royal Belgian Football Association expressed "astonishment," describing the reversal as a "direct contradiction" of the World Cup rule book. They attempted to lodge a formal appeal, which FIFA subsequently dismissed as "inadmissible."
Political Concerns
Global media outlets and sports commissioners have highlighted the incident as a prime example of the "weaponisation of sport for political purposes," noting that political leaders should not dictate outcomes to independent sporting institutions.
The event has been widely labeled by international critics as an unprecedented “political storm." While a few American proponents celebrated the decision, the majority recognised that the intervention fundamentally undermined FIFA's credibility. Worse, it damaged American soft power by associating it with perceived favoritism and bullying behaviour. Ironically, the U.S. hosting of football's marquee event was expected to give American soft power an uplift.
America’s Soft Power
Over the past decade, American soft power has experienced a notable and, by many metrics, sustained decline. While the United States remains a dominant cultural and technological force, its ability to influence global affairs through attraction and institutional leadership has been eroded significantly by political polarization, shifts in foreign policy, and a changing global order.
This latest unprecedented but what most observers view as typical Trumpian bullying conduct may just be the biggest hit to American soft power given the global audience of football. Even normal supporters of the U.S. have gone quiet or are in hiding on this incident.
Trends in Global Perception (2016–2026)
Polling data has already reflected a significant erosion of the world view of the U.S.
Favorability Ratings: According to Gallup, the percentage of the global population that views the U.S. favorably has remained largely below 50% since 2021. By 2026, roughly 40% of the world views the U.S. favorably, while 59% express an unfavorable view.
The "Reliability" Gap: Recent surveys from the Pew Research Center indicate that in many nations, majorities do not believe the U.S. contributes to global peace and stability or takes the interests of other nations into account.
Global Soft Power Index: As of January 2026, the Global Soft Power Index (Brand Finance) reported the United States experienced the steepest decline among 193 nations. While the U.S. is still favourably regarded by many less informed people primarily due to its historical influence, familiarity, and cultural/technological dominance, its reputation—specifically regarding governance, human rights, and rule of law—has suffered significant drops.
Main Drivers of Change
The decline in American soft power is frequently attributed to a combination of internal governance challenges and foreign policy shifts
1. Foreign Policy and "America First" Realignment
Multilateralism vs. Withdrawal: The pivot away from traditional multilateral institutions such as the United Nations and World Trade Organisation has weakened the perception of the U.S. as a reliable or trustworthy rules-based leader.
Transactional Diplomacy: A shift toward transactional and coercive approaches in international relations has come at the expense of "soft" attraction, as observers note a tendency to prioritize immediate national interest over long-term alliance building.
2. Domestic Political Polarization
Democracy and Rule of Law: Polling consistently shows that the global public is increasingly skeptical of American style democracy. As U.S. domestic institutions are seen as unstable or polarized, it diminishes the "model" power that historically attracted foreign audiences.
Institutional Trust: Domestic political volatility and foreign interventions has led to a perception that the U.S. is incapable of delivering on promises of stability, directly impacting its brand as a predictable global leader.
3. The Rise of Strategic Alternatives
China’s Multi-faceted Strategy: China has actively addressed its own perceptual weaknesses, focusing on economic expansion, technological advancement, and cultural engagement. According to the 2026 Global Soft Power Index, China has overtaken the U.S. in "Reputation" for the first time, positioning itself as a credible alternative for countries marginalized by Western-led structures and interpretation of rule of law and order.
4. Cultural and Technological Dominance
Despite the decline in political and diplomatic soft power, the U.S. retains a core of attraction through its cultural hegemony and dominance in arts, entertainment, and media. Some of its strongest supporters include those in Europe and Asia. They are associated with conservatives, extremists and fascists who blindly hero worship American achievements and see the U.S. as saving the world especially against China.
Another key positive is that Silicon Valley’s leadership in science and technology, and the internet, remains a primary anchor, ensuring the U.S. stays central to the global agenda.
Conclusion
There can be no doubt that American soft power is in precipitous decline. This perception, reinforced by the aggressive application of hard power in Venezuela and Iran, rests on the premise that global influence is increasingly derived from credibility and alignment with international norms, rather than hard power, coercive capacity and the pursuit of war.
The fundamental lesson is that when a state prioritizes hard power—military force, economic sanctions, and unilateral MAGA policies—it creates a paradox where the tools used to achieve tactical objectives simultaneously destroy the attraction that defines soft power
In an era of decentralized information and dominance by social media, the U.S. no longer has a monopoly of the global narrative. The global outrage over Trump’s attempt to influence a sporting event is indicative that, in the arena of soft power, the world's hegemonic power is no longer free from global scrutiny and criticism.
本文观点，不代表《东方日报》立场。
要看最快最熱資訊，請來Follow我們 《東方日報》WhatsApp Channel.
